Moonlight, a PI with some issues, like
a bullet fragment in his brain from an unsuccessful suicide attempt,
takes on an unusual client. Joan Parker survived an attack with a
fireman's ax that killed her husband. At the scene, she identified
her younger son, Christopher, as the perpetrator. Now she wants
Moonlight to proved he's innocent.
The book is a typical PI story. The
early chapters are mainly interviews with witnesses and potential
suspects, but the action picks up at the end. In fact, the ending is
quite violent. My problem with the progress of the story is that
premise, Joan's belief in Christopher's innocence, doesn't seem
reasonable in light of the ending. It's a though we're supposed to
forget where we started.
I didn't enjoy the book. Although I
enjoy classic noir and love Raymond Chandler. I don't enjoy detective
stories in first person present tense. It seems artificial. Using
'pose' instead of 'ask' to identify a question seemed unnecessarily
pretentious. The author tried to make Moonlight come across as a
hard-boiled detective, but I found his dialog rather strained.
However, the story moves along at a
good pace and if you can get by the author's peculiarities, it's a
good read.
I reviewed this book for the Amazon Vine Program.
I reviewed this book for the Amazon Vine Program.
Hi Nancy,
ReplyDeleteThanks for reviewing...It's "Murder by Moonlight"
:)
Cheers
VZ
Thanks, I made the correction. I kept calling it by the wrong name! Sorry.
ReplyDeleteEverybody confuses Midnight with Moonlight Nancy, no worries...:)
ReplyDeleteHa!
Thanks again
Vince